Disorders and Treatment
- Mental Illness
- Bipolar Disorder
- Mood Disorders
- Borderline Personality
- Mental Health Diagnosis
- Mental Health Treatments
- Alternative Meds
- Case Studies
I have already written several posts about the inappropriate "diagnosing" of bipolar disorder in children and the even more inappropriate use of antipsychotic medications in children. My main point has been that, rather than having a psychiatric disorder, the vast majority of these children are just acting out. (For those readers who have difficulty making distinctions - especially those who automatically assume that things that look vaguely alike must be identical - this opinion does NOT apply to those uncommon children who are actually psychotic or to older adolescents who are clearly and obviously manic).
So what proof can I offer? Well, at the American Psychiatric Association Annual Meeting, John Goethe, MD (director of the Burlingame Center for Psychiatric Research and Education at Hartford Hospital’s Institute of Living), presented the results of a decade-long study of antipsychotic prescribing for children and adolescents in psychiatric hospitals.
The results? Forty-five percent of patients with such behavioral disorders as ADHD or conduct disorder were given antipsychotics and 44% of patients with post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) received them. The percentage for other anxiety disorders was 31%!
Forgetting for the moment that an ADHD diagnosis may just be yet another case of acting out, antipsychotic medication is not indicated for ADHD. In adults, antipsychotic medications are not indicated nor FDA-approved for any anxiety disorder or PTSD. Not only that, but there is not the slightest evidence from any neurobiological study that the purported mechanism of action of antipsychotic medication has anything to do with anxiety disorders or ADHD.
And conduct disorder? This "disorder" was formerly called juvenille delinquincy. Acting out by any other name. Don't even get me started.
One of the predominant side effects of these medications, is however, sedation. So one might conclude that the reason the meds seem to both the parents and incompetent doctors to "work"is that the kids quiet down because they are being doped up. (This prescribing practice does not just apply to some psychiatrists but also to many other primary care doctors as well -as to pediatricians, read Claudia Gold's blogpost, Pediatricians Prescribing Psychiatric Medication: A Dose of Reality),
But who's anxiety is really being treated here?
I submit that it is the anxiety of the parents. Parents who have out-of-control, acting-out children are the real objects of these "treatments." These parents covertly feel guilty when they are unable to control their children due to inconsistent, neglectful, or abusive parenting practices. Yet they have great difficulty changing these practices for a variety of reasons - sometimes very understandable reasons. (One of which is that their doctors make no effort to understand what is really going on in their homes, and take advantage of their insecurities).
Nonetheless, when the kids are doped up and are therefore less trouble, the parents feel better. And they have the doctors stamp of approval that the problem resides entirely within the child, not with them.
|An unsolicited plug|
What hath Joseph Biederman wrought?
Of course, this whole process of sedating acting-out children usually does not end with the first prescription. For most drugs that have sedation as a side effect, the sedation gradually subsides after a few weeks on the medication. Then, of course, the kid starts doing what kids always do - start reverting back to their previous behavior.
The parents then drag him or her back to the incompetent doctor, who starts to take one of the following steps and then another, in no particular order:
Since the kid still is not controlled after the sedative side effect subsides, another step the parents can take is to apply for social security disability for the child. This gives the child the message that the parents think he or she is both sick and incompetent.
Readers of the blog know what I believe happens next. The child develops a false selfthat only seems to be sick and incompetent. Such children hide their abilities as they grow into adults, continue to act in ways that preclude employment, and continue on social security disability.
When you take the time to actually get to know them, however, it seems that the only thing they can not seem to do that most people can is maintain employment.
And then Robert Whitaker thinks that the medications were the cause of the disability, just like the less-than-thorough doctors thought that the medications caused the initial improvement of the child's "mental illness" when it was just a side effect that temporarily muted acting out behavior.
It always amazes me how much people who seem to be on opposite sides of a debate think alike. Basing their conclusions on totally incomplete information seems to be a favorite blind spot of theirs.
The information provided on the PsyWeb.com is designed to support, not replace, the relationship that exists between a patient/site visitor and his/her health professional. This information is solely for informational and educational purposes. The publication of this information does not constitute the practice of medicine, and this information does not replace the advice of your physician or other health care provider. Neither the owners or employees of PsyWeb.com nor the author(s) of site content take responsibility for any possible consequences from any treatment, procedure, exercise, dietary modification, action or application of medication which results from reading this site. Always speak with your primary health care provider before engaging in any form of self treatment. Please see our Legal Statement for further information.